[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML

• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>
• To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:00:48 -0500

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:54 AM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:

> The trouble is that HTML5 parsers will parse a large subset of XML but
> produce radically different parse trees, leading to silent data corruption.
>

Really? Is that deliberate? I thought one of the goals of HTML 5 was
to make sure parsers reported the same parse tree no matter what
garbage you threw at it.


-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@ibiblio.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

• References:
  • MicroXML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
  • Re: MicroXML
    • From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
  • XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: rjelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>