[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Towards XML 2.0

• From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:58:03 -0500

On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:59:00 -0000, Pete Cordell wrote:
> Original Message From: "David Lee"
>> Question:  I cant tell by reading this isf the Minimum  profile actually
>> requires parsing of namespaces.
> 
> The profiles seem more like XML 1.0 + XML Namespaces + other 
> additional profile specific stuff, rather than simplifications.  
> Personally it's not what I'm looking for.

Agreed.  The discussion on-list has already proposed at least best 
practices as to the location of namespace declarations (that wouldn't 
satisfy me, either, but it's a significant step beyond the profiles 
presented here).

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis                    amyzing {at} talsever.com
It is practically impossible to teach good programming to students that 
have had a prior exposure to BASIC: as potential programmers they are 
mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.
                -- Edsger Dijkstra

• References:
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: <vojtech.toman@emc.com>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Cecil New <cecil.new@gmail.com>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: <vojtech.toman@emc.com>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>