[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Assembly-language XML parser

• From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:55:45 -0400

On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 10:10 -0700, Rob Cameron wrote:

[...]

> Of course, this is still a research effort and the XML 
> community may be more interested in practical parsers.
> On that note, we have now switched emphasis from development
> of a standalone Parabix parser to development of
> accelerated versions of existing tools (Xerces, Saxon, etc.).

This is definitely a good idea!

[...]

> (4) Test the application against the W3C XML conformance
> suite (DTDless subset).

Please note (with my pedantic W3C hat on my head) that W3C doesn't
actually publish conformance tests for parsers -- rather, the test
is to see if the specification has been implemented.

So although these tests seem useful to people, you should also look
for parser-specific regression tests.

Best,

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org

• References:
  • Re: Assembly-language XML parser
    • From: Rob Cameron <cameron@cs.sfu.ca>