[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Holographic XML

• From: cbullard@hiwaay.net
• To: stephengreenubl@gmail.com
• Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:26:57 -0500

This may be one of the ultimate long cycle permathreads.  I believe we  
did this over a decade ago.  Before that, I used to make Newcomb and  
Kipp nuts with discussions such as this, or 'epiphanies' as Neill  
called them then.

Holography uses a medium to record an interference pattern from a  
reference beam and a signal beam.  In data storage media, the  
reference beam (a constant) reprojects the image.  For physical  
optical data storage, the technology is straightforward enough.  To  
analogize to XML, you will need analogous roles for these four  
components of the idea.

Holography isn't a 3D picture.  As the Wikipedia resource puts it, it  
is more analogous to a sound recording.  Working the 3Dness of it may  
or may not be fruitful but YMMV.  As I recall the last time through  
this topic we came to topic maps, link collections and as Kurt reminds  
us, RDF.

Kallisti.

len


Quoting "stephengreenubl@gmail.com" <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>:

>
> Links within a line between points make the line two dimensional.  
> Links between lines make them three dimensional.
> In XML points or nodes are related to eachother making the XML two  
> dimensional. It follows that relationships between instances make  
> for three dimensional XML. Such might be found in a collection or  
> database holding and relating several instances or by using XLink or  
> in the case of XHTML, hyperlinks.
>
> Best regards, Steve
> Stephen D Green
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Hunsberger
> Sent:  07/09/2010 7:15:02 pm
> To: Micah Dubinko
> Cc: Costello, Roger L.; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject:  Re:  Holographic XML
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Micah Dubinko
> <Micah.Dubinko@marklogic.com> wrote:
>> XML is 1-dimensional. It is defined as a sequence of characters.  
>> This is true even of, for example, an SVG document.
>>
>> There is no need for XML to "expand" to more dimensions, though  
>> higher-level layers might come in to play.
>>
>
> I'd disagree: a sequence of characters is a lower level representation
> than XML; XML adds semantic and syntactic representation on top of
> that and gives you much more than a "sequence of characters."
>
> --
> Peter Hunsberger
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Holographic XML
    • From: Robin LaFontaine <robin.lafontaine@deltaxml.com>
  • Re: Holographic XML
    • From: David <dlee@calldei.com>

• References:
  • RE: Holographic XML
    • From: "stephengreenubl@gmail.com" <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>