[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML spec and XSD
> This particular paragraph clearly conveys, that a XML > document is valid *only* in the context of a DTD. This is no > longer true given that XSD, RelaxNG and Schematron are also > standard based XML validation languages, and most of the > world recognizes these newer Schema languages. When the XML specification uses the word "entity", it means something entirely different from what the UML spec means by "entity". That does not make the things it says about entities untrue: it just means that the reader has to be careful to remember what the meaning of the word is in the context of a particular specification. Similarly, the word "valid" in the XML specification has a different meaning from its use in the XSD specification. Also similarly, the word "processor" in the XML specification means something different from "processor" in the XSLT specification. Such differences are entirely legitimate. When discussing technology in a wider context, it's often wise to qualify your language to avoid misunderstanding, by talking of an "XML entity" or an "XML processor" or of documents being "DTD-valid". But it would be tedious to do that within a specification, where it's hard enough to avoid 6-tuple compound nouns at the best of times. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|