[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML spec and XSD

• From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
• Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:10:11 +0530

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Rick Jelliffe
<rjelliffe@allette.com.au> wrote:
> A standard does not reflect common usage. It defines its own little world of
> tight technical terms.  You are thinking of a dictionary perhaps?

I agree, that standards are very specific. Standards have their own
notion of correctness :) But if something, that's said in the standard
deviates from the reality, then the standard should modify itself.
Standard revisions and erratas achieve this purpose.

We are not asking to invent something different with the XML spec. We
are I think, only asking the XML spec to express the reality.


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

• References:
  • XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>