[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XPointer is dead. What about XLink?
> It's probably time to reconsider it, as I think the Web is > finally open to new possibilities again. At the XML level, links/relationships should (just like elements and attributes) be marked up in whatever way the particular vocabulary designer thinks appropriate. In a user interface vocabulary, such as HTML or XSL-FO, there is a need to standardize how links are represented. But if we want enhanced behaviour for links, the first thing is to put it at the right point in the architecture. That's the user-interface vocabulary, not the data representation - and that's what XLink got wrong. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|