[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: My proposal: Implicit namespaces
Dave Pawson schrieb: > On 08/06/2009 10:21 AM, Michael Kay wrote: >> Another way to achieve this goal is to allow the designer of an XML >> vocabulary (=a set of namespaces) to define >> >> (a) a list of predeclared namespace prefixes for that vocabulary >> >> (b) a list of local names that are known to be in each of those >> namespaces >> >> When invoking an XML parser, the user should be able to reference >> this "vocabulary definition", and the XML parser should use it to >> resolve (a) any undeclared namespace prefixes, and (b) any unprefixed >> local names. An "nnML parser" is then an XML parser with built-in >> knowledge of the nnML vocabulary definition. > > So for docbook you'd have an author include all 300+ namespaced > elements Mike? No, "the user should be able to reference this 'vocabulary definition'". Like - trying again :-) - in the DocBook DTD, which, in the future, might contain the <!NAMESPACE org.docbook (para etc)> definitions. > Fine if Norm had them somewhere on the net I could reference them, > but simply not practical to inline them in the document surely? You might, however, be allowed to parametrize or enhance the vocabulary in the internal subset. -- Michael Ludwig
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|