[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1<assert>

• From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
• To: "'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
• Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:29:14 -0400

 
> a paragraph cannot appear nested
> within another paragraph unless 
> there is an intervening table, which is in
> my book a structural rule 

Awesome example!

So "structural rules" are those that specify constraints on the structure of XML instances? That is, they specify what elements and attributes can go where.

Here's a rule that has nothing to do with the structure of XML instances: 

   The meeting start-time must be before the end-time.

Therefore, this is a business rule and should not be expressed in XML Schema using the <assert> element, correct?

Another example,

    The total-amount-due for an order is
    computed as the sum of the line-item
    amount(s) for the order plus tax.

Again, this has nothing to do with the structure of XML instances and therefore is a business rule and should not be expressed in XML Schema using the <assert> element, correct?


Let me summarize what I've learned:

1. Use the <assert> element only to express structural rules.

2. Structural rules are those that specify constraints on the structure of XML instances; that is, what elements and attributes can go where.

3. All other rules (non-structural rules) are business rules and should be not expressed in XML Schema using the <assert> element.

Do you agree?

/Roger

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • RE: Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1<assert> element a step backwards?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>

• References:
  • Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> elementa step backwards?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1<assert> element a step backwards?
    • From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
  • RE: Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1<assert> element a step backwards?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • RE: Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • RE: Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1<assert> element a step backwards?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • RE: Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>