[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Chuck Bearden <cbearden@r...> wrote: > [...] > The decision was made (a) to add a version attribute to the root element, > and (b) not to change the namespace URI (which was already unversioned). > Did the maintainers of EgXML make the right choice? What happens when a message needs to be constructed, exchanged, and validated, which contains content defined by both v1 and v2? A majority of schema-validating XML parsers support only a single schema for a given namespace on a particular validation pass. What happens when a message is constructed that only uses content from v1 or v2, without using the designated root element? How does the receiver determine the appropriate schema when the version is not explicitly referenced? Webb Roberts
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|