[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
I won't comment on the success or failure of RDF, but it seems to me that it's highly abstract, not necessarily highly generic. What is a generic vocabulary? One that serves too many masters? Poorly focused? Become confused in the minds of consumers as referring to a whole class of (vocabularies | schemas) rather than just the one? Bruce B Cox Manager, Standards Development Division OCIO/SDMG 571-272-9004 -----Original Message----- From: Frank Manola [mailto:fmanola@a...] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 11:12 AM To: Peter Hunsberger Cc: James Fuller; xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:23 AM, Peter Hunsberger wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:04 AM, James Fuller > <james.fuller.2007@g...> wrote: > >> >> point 2. If an XML vocabulary is too generic it will fail >> > > So, what's the consensus; is RDF a failure? Nope. Just generic enough. > > > -- > Peter Hunsberger > > _______________________________________________________________________
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|