[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schem

• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@c...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:51:34 +0000

>> 2. I validated the XML instance document with the schema.
>
> ... when I'm using validation to augment my XML....

imho, "validation" and "augment" should be kept separate... If you
need the augmentation call the step just that, not validation.

I don't know the history of it, but I would guess defaulted values
were a late addition to the validation process, rather than something
included from the beginning??

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
    • From: David Orchard <orchard@p...>

• References:
  • Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>