[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Tradeoffs of XML encoding by enclosing all content in CDAT
In article <43A9274214C240AB9F3000273156C996@Sealion> you write: >The best argument is that people who adopt this approach usually fail to >check for the presence of "]]>", which isn't allowed in CDATA sections. Once >you start checking for that and dealing with it properly, it turns out to be >easier to check for & and < and escape them as &_amp; and &_lt; >respectively. (Underscores inserted to prevent misformatting). You need to add > to your list of characters to escape, or else check for ]]> even when not using CDATA, because that sequence is not legal in text content. -- Richard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|