[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?

• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• To: mike@m...
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:13:50 +0200

I don't think that statement holds at all together since the
referenced definition uses OPEC as an example which does not form a
word with a meaning from a different context. It also doesn't follow
with almost all of the examples of acronyms given in the references
cited in this discussion so far.

at any rate I have always understood acronyms as being a subset of
abbreviation which seems to be the general consensus (not just in
xml-dev but in the various references already cited). As such why is
there both abbr and acronym in the spec. It seems sort of redundant,
probably there should just be abbr and then you can have a
class="acronym" on it.


Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen


On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:04 AM,  <mike@m...> wrote:
> "abbreviation - a shortened or contracted form of a word or phrase,
> used to represent the whole, as Dr. for Doctor, lb. for pound.
>
> acronym - a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters
> of words in a set phrase or series of words, as OPEC from Organization
> of Petroleum Exporting Countries."
>
> The dictionary is quite clear so I cannot understand the confusion. To qualify as an acronym, the abbreviation must form a *word*. To qualify as a word it must appear in a dictionary, not just in the tautological sense that common abbreviations appear in dictionaries, but with a meaning from a different context. So GNU is a genuine acronym since it appears in the dictionary as an animal. XML is definitely not. The only confusion can occur when the abbreviation is pronounceable other than as individual letters so that it might qualify as a word rather than just a sequence of letters. A purist might disagree with the above dictionary since opec is not otherwise a word despite being pronounceable. The true art of acronym formation is not only to form a genuine word, but one that has some relevance to the original context, though I cannot think of a good example at the moment. Anyway XML certainly does not qualify!
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>

• References:
  • Re: Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?
    • From: mike@m...