Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Probelm with the mailing list
 Everytime i mail i get a message delivery failure message. Is this usual ? by http://augustus.ballarat.edu.au/ (1.04.89) with SMTP id 2112631750;A sample message i get is below. Anishek With reference to your message addressed to: javery@s... One or more addresses in your message have failed with the following responses from the mail transport system: User <javery@s...> is not known at this site Should you need assistance, please mail postmaster@s... ------------------- Returned message follows ---------------------- Received: from http://eureka.ballarat.edu.au/ ([http://141.132.64.2/]) Wed, 6 Aug 2008 19:21:20 +1000 Received: from http://tiberius.ballarat.edu.au/ (http://tiberius.ballarat.edu.au/ [http://141.132.64.63/]) by http://eureka.ballarat.edu.au/ (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id m769LG2X006303for <j.avery@b...>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 19:21:16 +1000 (EST) Received: from http://antispam.ballarat.edu.au/ ([http://141.132.64.7/]) by http://tiberius.ballarat.edu.au/ (1.04.89) with SMTP id 2106550921; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 19:20:46 +1000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0BACMMl0hCl+o+mWdsb2JhbACCIy6ObgEBAQEBCAUGCREFmgeEVA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,314,1215352800"; d="scan'208";a="16159436"Received: from http://ms01.oasis-open.org/ ([http://66.151.234.62/]) by http://antispam.ballarat.edu.au/ with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2008 19:20:43 +1000Received: from [http://10.0.0.2/] (helo=http://mail.oasis-open.org/) by http://ms01.oasis-open.org/ with esmtp id 1KQfC7-00021N-TCfor j.avery@b...; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:20:36 -0400 Received: (qmail 5907 invoked by uid 60909); 6 Aug 2008 09:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xml-dev-help@l...; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list xml-dev@l...Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:xml-dev@l...> List-Help: <mailto:xml-dev-help@l...> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...> List-Subscribe: <mailto:xml-dev-subscribe@l...> Received: (qmail 5899 invoked by uid 0); 6 Aug 2008 09:20:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;d=http://gmail.com/; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to bh=RnZkMpfxFKOH/84TEMjGZxO023im2+HIU3og5vC/7f8=; b=KRIkX7MS6uLIm+2CY12eV+84HPYP0kMIPmETZ6oKbAGiIs2d/9TGdGS0BdCz2hK8dO c/omyUoe5c7W+N39OlAzFYcB5rgLxNk7rjVy/Ltv/IcY4+RQOmgwDjLsvgdsNz3UD4M0 rqX4sK0iXm3WWyFnZF1pqr2F6NHEJCwrC0+dQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-versiond=http://gmail.com/; s=gamma; :content-type:references; b=P/F8BQthfv/EqsRzjPP5W7z9F+Yw5bbfZBWlV3Js/4/FTlrHRqoSMnyGZQ7+iQ2SXV Uke9uqtZ1gvOOQ4VuFmLVnwxzAL+SQTUpbwg01AmsLd5HqtlWipfHh6qLFHs2WJKZNvR G6mnaEelx67J4WGISs6kFRCo4hFPCXqX8Syxo= Message-ID: <b1c8e2c80808060220v70e7dc62v3976e29e85a63008@m...">b1c8e2c80808060220v70e7dc62v3976e29e85a63008@m...> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:50:21 +0530 From: "Anishek Agarwal" <anishek@g...> To: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>Cc: xml-dev@l... In-Reply-To: <74a894af0808060200h2024b63ei32ad8a14785fd5ad@m...">74a894af0808060200h2024b63ei32ad8a14785fd5ad@m...> MIME-Version: 1.0 boundary="----=_Part_1762_2080986.1218014421667"Content-Type: multipart/alternative; References: <b1c8e2c80808052153g1d7a0745tdc73dc1157fb9289@m...">b1c8e2c80808052153g1d7a0745tdc73dc1157fb9289@m...> <74a894af0808060200h2024b63ei32ad8a14785fd5ad@m...">74a894af0808060200h2024b63ei32ad8a14785fd5ad@m...><AEAED1A0F61C47F28FA678D2050A5323@Sealion> X-Antivirus-Scanner: ClamAV at OASIS detected no problems X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Level: -- Subject: Re: XML Transformation ------=_Part_1762_2080986.1218014421667Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline - Show quoted text - According to the xml specification though http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#scoping-defaulting the inner scope definition overrides the parent one if the NSAttName is the same. In our case of the xml above it is the same as its the default namespace. So i dont see why the inner scope namespace declaration element be removed and use the parent namespace. Anishek On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>wrote: > > For better or worse, the digital signature mechanisms follow XML > > Canonicalization by deciding that namespace prefixes are significant: see > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n#NoNSPrefixRewriting > > > > for discussion. > > ! That's good to know... > > I guess it all comes down the fact that the prefix isn't expanded to > the URI.... which is the root cause of the problem of XPath requiring > the prefixes to be mapped elsewhere. > > I guess there is an argument for dropping the URI altogether, and just > using the prefix. Some things would get harder, but many more would > get a lot easier. > > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com/ > Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/ > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 <div dir="ltr">According to the xml specification thoughContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline <a href=""http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#scoping-defaulting">http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#scoping-defaulting</a> the inner scope definition overrides the parent one if the <a id="scoping" name="scoping">NSAttName is the same. In our case of the xml above it is the same as its the default namespace. So i dont see why the inner scope namespace declaration element be removed</a><a id="scoping" name="scoping"></a> and use the parent namespace. <br> <br> <br>Anishek<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Andrew Welch <span dir="ltr"><<a href=""mailto: <div class="Ih2E3d">> For better or worse, the digital signature mechanisms follow XML<br> > Canonicalization by deciding that namespace prefixes are significant: see<br> ><br> > <a href=""http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n#NoNSPrefixRewriting" target="_blank">http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n#NoNSPrefixRewriting</a><br> ><br> > for discussion.<br> <br> </div>! That's good to know...<br> <br> I guess it all comes down the fact that the prefix isn't expanded to<br> the URI.... which is the root cause of the problem of XPath requiring<br> the prefixes to be mapped elsewhere.<br> <br> I guess there is an argument for dropping the URI altogether, and just<br> using the prefix. Some things would get harder, but many more would<br> get a lot easier.<br> <font color="#888888"><br> <br> --<br> Andrew Welch<br> <a href=""http://andrewjwelch.com/" target="_blank">http://andrewjwelch.com/</a><br> Kernow: <a href=""http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/" target="_blank">http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/</a><br> </font></blockquote></div><br></div> ------=_Part_1762_2080986.1218014421667--  [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
