[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why is there an "S" in XSLT?
> For example, instead of this: > Write this: > Comments? With the former anyone (XML aware enough to be looking at all) will instantly recognise the thing as XSLT, with the latter, almost everyone will have to stop and think about equivalence of namespace prefixes, and of the equivalence between the styleseet and transform local names. Why introduce that cognitive burden? The question of when to use xsl:transform and when to use xsl:stylesheet comes up from time to time on xsl-list, and the answer I always give is just to use a simple rule: always use xsl:stylesheet Personally I always use xsl:stylesheet as the name of the top level element and call the thing a "stylesheet" even if it's doing stuff not normally associated with styling (such as generating C or C# or whatever we are doing at the moment). English isn't such a regular language that I'd worry too much about minor idiosyncrasies such as the fact that something called a stylesheet isn't a sheet and isn't related to styling:-) David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|