[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- orforward-compatibi
REALITY ALERT: Yes, there will be (are) folks who will call a business service who don't have a clear understanding of its purpose. Adding a managed semantic description of the service as Stephen suggests (at some considerable cost, especially for maintenance) has not (ask any professional librarian) and will not solve that problem, regardless of the technological implementation (RDF, Web 3.0, or whatever). It merely shifts the problem, and to a large extent obfuscates it with ontologies and other such white elephants. A WSDL is indecipherable outside its technological context and the corresponding service is unusable outside its business context. Adding a semantic layer merely recasts some small part of the context, but not nearly enough to overcome the need for a complete understanding of the business space in order to use a service successfully in a business sense. There are limits to what can be practically automated, and the very concept of a "semantic web" crosses that line, in my judgment. In fifty years of schooling and work experience, I've seen no evidence that any mechanism of any kind whatever "obliges service consumers to 'understand' ". You have to take them by the hand, look into their eyes, and teach them, and even then you can only hope that they get it. Please forgive the bombast, and my apologies to all who are committed to the semantic web. I sincerely hope some good will come from it, even if I can't see yet what that will be. Bruce B Cox Manager, Standards Development Division US Patent & Trademark Office The contents of this message are the personal opinions of the author and must not be construed as an official statement of the USPTO. -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Green [mailto:stephengreenubl@g...] Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 6:32 PM To: Fraser Goffin Cc: Costello, Roger L.; xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange On 29/12/2007, Fraser Goffin <goffinf@g...> wrote: > ... Is > it really the case that we will have callers of a business service who > DON'T have a clear understanding of it's purpose (semantics) ? ... and > if the semantics aren't conveyed in the technical artefacts > (WSDL/XSD), can we really have 'unknown' callers (h'mmm not sure) ?? > So this supports my hunch that what we all need for a further technological step is to start adding the semantics, via say RDF, etc, to the basic WSDL and XSD of web services. This ties the semantics more firmly to the syntax. It then obliges service consumers to 'understand' (both in the human, and hopefully also in the machine processing sense) the semantics when using the syntax. It also will, hopefully, maximize the visibility of both changes to semantics and to syntax/structure. Isn't this a natural extension of the semantic web/Web 3.0 principles and in a very worthwhile direction? More intelligent web services? -- Stephen Green Partner SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|