[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Will the next version of XML Schema have a schema-for-sche

• From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:55:57 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Kay writes:

> I wasn't there either, but I always thought that they took DTDs as the
> starting point, and then added capabilities corresponding to the main ways
> in which parameter entities were believed to be used to achieve
> customization and reuse.

I _was_ there, and that's a good summary.  I'd add two more points:
introducing the tag/type distinction and removing the most egregious
differences between attribute and element type declarations.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHHHOtkjnJixAXWBoRAtoKAJ4oXGCf2W8Akg77+CAM0+6lLWY0VACfSwf7
usfagG+tD2fPgrMEPSYTQSY=
=89up
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • Will the next version of XML Schema have a schema-for-schemas that is standalone (no English prose needed to describe constraints in the language)?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: Will the next version of XML Schema have a schema-for-schemas that is standalone (no English prose needed to describe constraints in the language)?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: Will the next version of XML Schema have aschema-for-schemas that is standalone (no English prose needed to describeconstraints in the language)?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Will the next version of XML Schema have a schema-for-schemas that is standalone (no English prose needed to describe constraints in the language)?
    • From: "Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev)" <abcoatesecure-xmldev@y...>
  • RE: Will the next version of XML Schema have a schema-for-schemas that is standalone (no English prose needed to describe constraints in the language)?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>