[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSD - Validator problem

• From: "Sebastian Hinterwälder"<sebi-hinterwaelder@g...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:01:10 +0200

Hi,

thanks to all of you for the solutions. Actually I worked a little bit on it and tried to differ and comment a little bit in the XSD-document and now it finally works also in XMLSpy 2007. It seemed that in the following passage there was something wrong with the element ref="xmta:ProtoInstance" in the code and some validators didn't mention an error but only everytime the XMLSpy throwed an error.
:
<element name="color" form="qualified" minOccurs="0">
    <complexType>
               <choice minOccurs="0">
            <element ref="xmta:Color"/>
                        <!--element ref="xmta:ProtoInstance"/-->
        </choice>
    </complexType>
</element>


Now I commented it and all following elements, because I anyway don't need to validate my xml against this passage. So actually you , Cristian , were right in your first reply that the validator wasn't able to locate the actual error and therefore throwed an error in the first line of code.

Greets Sebastian
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger

• References:
  • XSD - Validator problem
    • From: "Sebastian Hinterwälder"<sebi-hinterwaelder@g...>
  • RE: XSD - Validator problem
    • From: "Gerald Sheehan" <gerald.sheehan@a...>
  • Re: RE: XSD - Validator problem
    • From: "Sebastian Hinterwälder"<sebi-hinterwaelder@g...>
  • Re: RE: XSD - Validator problem
    • From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>
  • RE: RE: XSD - Validator problem
    • From: "Gerald Sheehan" <gerald.sheehan@a...>
  • RE: RE: XSD - Validator problem
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: RE: XSD - Validator problem
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: RE: XSD - Validator problem
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: XSD - Validator problem
    • From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@M...>