[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re[2]: SQL5

• From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:09:43 +0300

Julian,

>> But argument against are the following:
>> large manufactorers (e.g. Oracle, etc) refuse implement before standardization.
JR> you may not be able to standardize without showing at least one reference
JR> implementation.
Isn't it ???

>> (1) Ideas (instead of algorithms) are not capable to be patented !
>> (2) International patent does not exist
>> (if you want to patent, you must make this in each country separetely).
JR> If there are patents that are valid, you may either have to pay license
JR> fees, or you won't be able to release that product in the country where
JR> the patent is hold. When you're doing open source, you may be even in
JR> bigger trouble because your open source license may be fundamentally
JR> incompatible with the license terms of the patent holder.
To what you want to point:
(1) that my ideas maybe already come into some head, and is alreade patented
(2) that someone, who read my proposals, will patent them faster
(3) something else ?


Dmitry Turin
SQL5      (5.5.0)  http://sql50.euro.ru
HTML6     (6.4.3)  http://html60.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7.2.0)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2.0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru

• References:
  • Re[4]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • Re: Re[4]: SQL5
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re[6]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • Re: SQL5
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
  • Re[2]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • Re: SQL5
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>