[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML design of ((a and b) or c)

• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: Leigh.Klotz@x...
• Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:34:15 GMT

> Let me clarify the XSLT point: XSLT defines functions such as current()
> which are not in the XPath set.

ah those yes.  But they are not extension functions, they are
"additional functions", if they'd been called extension functions they'd
have had to prefix them....

> XForms and XSLT bear the same relationship to XPath.
any chance that xforms 1.x could redefine its xpath extensions as
instead a subset of xpath2, so as to keep the relationship holding?

David

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML design of ((a and b) or c)
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>

• References:
  • RE: XML design of ((a and b) or c)
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>