[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: minOccurs maxOccurs doesnt seem to be working correctly in

• To: Paul Spencer <xml-dev-list@b...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: minOccurs maxOccurs doesnt seem to be working correctly in my schema
• From: Marielou <marielou_h@y...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:18:02 +0100 (BST)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wVZpp4FZXdChjCEkNiYvWJc3x3QqmyD17w7aTrL5uoWVil7rAM1jPRURQ21Ivb7yw8idFrraGqiTuwcVBRISRxoVmeN6f3XkH9cXsxZnIzHYEsOPy0jyrgbFtoDC5PPmQhZvt5Ht0LOYft1+udzcO/WkoocSdyGVosn4KhlxUvM= ;
• In-reply-to: <NBBBIBMKFOFCNEBAKDPLOELNKPAA.xml-dev-list@b...>

> "local and
> top-level element
> declarations only"
does this disallow using <all> with {min occurs}=0 or
1, {max occurs}=1, and using element ref to reference
another  element which has a <sequence> which can
occur more than 1x? 

Marie Louise

--- Paul Spencer <xml-dev-list@b...> wrote:

> I have not looked at the detail of your schema, but
> the bit below is
> enough - you cannot have unrestricted order and
> allow unrestricted
> cardinality. In this case, most people would use
> xs:sequence.
> 
> From 3.8.1 of XML Schema Pt1 for xs:all: "... the
> element information item
> [children] ·validated· by the model group must: ...
> contain all and only
> exactly zero or one of each element specified in
> {particles}. The elements
> can occur in any order. In this case, to reduce
> implementation complexity,
> {particles} is restricted to contain local and
> top-level element
> declarations only, with {min occurs}=0 or 1, {max
> occurs}=1."
> 
> Paul Spencer
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marielou [mailto:marielou_h@y...]
> > Sent: 13 June 2006 17:14
> > To: xml-dev@l...
> > Subject:  minOccurs maxOccurs doesnt seem
> to be working
> > correctly in my schema
> >
> >
> > In my schema, elements should not have any
> > restrictions on their sequence however they have
> > restrictions on their occurence, some can occur
> more
> > than once, the number of occurences is specified
> in
> > the schema.
> 
> 


Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: minOccurs maxOccurs doesnt seem to be working correctly in my schema
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • RE: minOccurs maxOccurs doesnt seem to be working correctly in my schema
    • From: "Paul Spencer" <xml-dev-list@b...>

• Prev by Date: RE: minOccurs maxOccurs doesnt seem to be working correctly in my schema
• Next by Date: RE: minOccurs maxOccurs doesnt seem to be working correctly in my schema
• Previous by thread: RE: minOccurs maxOccurs doesnt seem to be working correctly in my schema
• Next by thread: RE: minOccurs maxOccurs doesnt seem to be working correctly in my schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread