[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today

• To: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...>,"Michael Kay" <mike@s...>,"Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>,<andrzej@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:44:43 -0400
• Thread-index: AcZ0cNhxQ9ga8QTkS6a7Qc1vdrXqwwAk/8YQAANi2+AAA4wNIAAClNFg
• Thread-topic: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today

Yes, object oriented is a great example (not to denegrate the others
either). 

Joe

Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
 
700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
O: 202-508-6514  
C: 202-251-0731
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)
[mailto:natyoung@c...] 
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 1:45 PM
To: Michael Kay; Bullard, Claude L (Len); andrzej@c...;
xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE:  Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today

Hi.

How about:

 - object oriented architecture
 - transaction oriented architecture
 - message oriented architecture
 - connection oriented architecture
 - communication oriented architecture
 - pipeline oriented architecture

I'm only half joking making this list.  "Orienting" an architecture
towards something is only loosely meaningful according to any
definitive, measurable criteria.  At the same time I don't think it's
meaningless at all.  The buzzwords ultimately serve to get a wide swath
of developers paying attention to similar things at any given time.

---->N





.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:
||:.

Nathan Young
CDC Site Design & Development->Interface Development Team
A: ncy1717
E: natyoung@c...  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@s...]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:54 AM
> To: 'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'; andrzej@c...; 
> xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
> 
> > SOA isn't meaningless.
> 
> I'll believe that when someone can point me to an architecture that is

> demonstrably *not* a service-oriented architecture. For the term to be

> meaningful, there must be things that are clearly outside the 
> definition, and those things must be architectures.
> 
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an 
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread