[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Improving XML desing?

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Improving XML desing?
• From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>
• Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 03:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <BAY118-F32C5D2EAF4A256B982183EDCA90@p...>
• References: <20060508173416.GE13492@w...> <BAY118-F32C5D2EAF4A256B982183EDCA90@p...>

In

[http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2006/04/canonml-markup-language-beyond-tex-xml.html]

i presented some basic thoughts on CanonML, a markup language beyond TeX,
XML, and alternatives as liminal, GODDAG, SGML concur, and others. The new
approach is clearly inspired in SXML.

Some of technical points of CanonML are beyond XML (i mean if one wait
backward compatibility with XML 1.0-1.1), but other points could be
considered for discussion on a future XML specification.

For example, a place for lot of improvement is XML namespace model. There
is some ideas discussed in above link.

Another interesting posibility is to rewritte XML documents in CanonML
superset, using specific CanonML propoerties for those tasks do not well
covered by XML.


Juan R.

Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)

• References:
  • Re: Xml internationalization design
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Xml internationalization design
    • From: "tom tom" <tomxsllist@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xml internationalization design
• Next by Date: Re: Improving XML desing?
• Previous by thread: Re: Xml internationalization design
• Next by thread: What Is Extensibility? (WAS RE: overheads of pipelines)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread