[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Java NVDL implementation

• To: XML Dev ML <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Java NVDL implementation
• From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@y...>
• Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:58:33 +0200 (CEST)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MLYTwYxBDxMc/qXGY1vli3I0MyyuxZDvWNSx/x5I+f5an9KmvcoPZlxzHsgdpFFyXUJzwE7EKiP2RVwAAmHuxU8pH5Zdm6CFVwhUOjqXeCkcauiHD0/LJ2Npw6Z+A2j8lHDfXVS9ClID10vUDf2Qh+6a1EPyKWN0+e9WF+H4ZFs= ;
• In-reply-to: <445E102A.70404@k...>

> Yes, as XHTML specifies that XHTML document must start
> with html element. May be it is not good idea to provide
> sample which doesn't validate, but OTOH you can see that
> validator is doing something ;-)

  Ok.  But I tought such an example will show me the
dispatching capability of JNVDL, not just show me that it
detect there is no mandatory HTML element, as any validator
does.

  IMHO, adding the proper HTML, HEAD and BODY elements will
be more valuable.  And maybe have two such examples: one
that validates, and the other with an error in one XForms
element.

  In all cases, I'm happy to have such a tool :-)

  My two cents.

  Regards,

--drkm
























	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver directement vos services préférés : vérifiez vos nouveaux mails, lancez vos recherches et suivez l'actualité en temps réel. 
Rendez-vous sur http://fr.yahoo.com/set

• References:
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Java NVDL implementation
• Next by Date: RE: [Watchers of the Web] The evolving form of information on the Web?
• Previous by thread: Re: Java NVDL implementation
• Next by thread: RE: Java NVDL implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread