[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM
On Apr 25, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Tatu Saloranta wrote: > Namespace handling is an absolute mess, and > alternatives I have tried (JDOM, XOM) all implement in > less messy way, and significantly so. FWIW. Namespace support was 'tacked on' to DOM, just as it was to XML. It was totally superfluous then and has simply complicated things since IMHO. DOM is a good case in point. >> That said, I rarely use DOM anyway: I do almost >> everything in SAX... > > That's pretty hard-core. ;-) > (due to SAX imposed "involuntary > inversion-of-control") Not really... how often do you *really* want the XML in DOM in your application? I very rarely do... though I use XML as a storage format a lot.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|