[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Call for fast XML implementations

• To: Phil Nash <phil.nash.lists@g...>
• Subject: Re: Call for fast XML implementations
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:46:28 +0100
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>,W3C EXI Public <public-exi@w...>
• In-reply-to: <44243BE2.9080306@g...>
• References: <64FC73EF-3F94-4F6E-BC72-0E0879DF3423@e...> <44243BE2.9080306@g...>

Hi Phil,

On Mar 24, 2006, at 19:35, Phil Nash wrote:
> Robin Berjon wrote:
>>  * If you wish to be extra helpful, you can also include the small  
>> amount of code and configuration required to run the parser within  
>> our framework, which is built on top of Japex (https:// 
>> japex.dev.java.net/). If you're interested, we'd be delighted to  
>> help you get started.
>
> Does this imply that only java parsers will be considered?

No, the framework that we're building can also measure the  
performance of C++ implementations, in fact some of our candidates  
use that.

> As it is the implementation is a way off complete yet. What sort of  
> time scales are we looking at?

Our publication date for the first pass on our measurements is May,  
and the earlier the better. That being said proving that EXI is not  
needed can be done at any time before we go to CR, which is at an as  
yet unknown time in 2007.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

• References:
  • Call for fast XML implementations
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: Call for fast XML implementations
    • From: Phil Nash <phil.nash.lists@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Call for fast XML implementations
• Next by Date: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
• Previous by thread: Re: Call for fast XML implementations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread