[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Schema Extensibility

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Schema Extensibility
• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:48:19 +1100
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FF13@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FF13@h...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

>... The geographic descriptors 
>may be using OGC standards such as the Geographic Markup 
>Language (GML).  The location standard common in America 
>is WS84, but in Australia it is GDA94.  If a third standard 
>that includes both requirements chooses the American common 
>descriptors over the Australian, and chooses to use homebrew 
>descriptors for geographic elements over say, GML, then 
>at this point, a global vendor has no choice but to 
>gut the standard with variants.  One prefers to do this 
>using an acceptable version indicator or even by extension, 
>but it will be done regardless of the intent of the 
>committees.
>
I don't agree that the smaller countries (i.e. the US or Europe) should 
have to
yield to the larger country (i.e. Australia, including our Antarctic 
Territories.)
For a start, I can imagine that our standard unit of distance (the "hop") ,
area (the "square hop"), and longtitude and latitude (the "hopalong" and 
"hopalot")
would be unintuitive for people from the kangaroo-poor nations, however
reasonable they may seem to us.

With the customary marsupial blandishments,
Skippy

• References:
  • RE: Schema Extensibility
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Sanity check please
• Next by Date: Re: XML in my morning post
• Previous by thread: RE: Schema Extensibility
• Next by thread: RE: Schema Extensibility
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread