[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Using The Principle of Least Power As A Razor
>From: Rick Marshall [mailto:rjm@z...] >i'm surprised noone took you up on this one len. I'm not. The TAG debated this and their are drafts for it, but no one seems to be able to clarify it past discussions of Turing completeness, reuse of data, etc. Kolmogorov complexity came up too. These are the kinds of topics we've debated here in the past, so I thought the collective brain power here might be able to find a fresh perspective. Thanks! >here's my simple take on this interesting probem: >1. you need to distinguish between power and typing - does language a >require more or less typing? in general (flame me if you like) almost >all languages derive their "power" from a decrease in the amount of >typing to get the same result. That is somewhat close to what is said on the TAG list. I ask, if a language implementation is silently casting, is that more or less powerful? Berners-Lee seems to be focused on reuse aspects. Powerful languages that require a lot of say, object technology, just to express data are more powerful but not as good for the web user because the data can't be reused easily if at all. I get that but is that all there is to it? len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|