[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Common Word Processing Format

• To: "Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)" <natyoung@c...>
• Subject: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:09:17 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <0DF8CBE327D4654F8567FD8123E328B1010A564E@x...>
• Organization: Fourthought, Inc.
• References: <0DF8CBE327D4654F8567FD8123E328B1010A564E@x...>

On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 16:56 -0800, Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen
at Cisco) wrote:
> On the flip side I'd certainly want to avoid using XHTML + semantics
> tunneled through attributes for anything that wasn't already and always
> to be a web page... hence my objection to boom, and to XHTML used as a
> WP format.

A ha.  This in a nutshell is my position.  Violent agreement.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net                    http://fourthought.com
http://copia.ogbuji.net                   http://4Suite.org
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/

• References:
  • RE: Common Word Processing Format
    • From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by Date: Re: <monty>Re: Preserving whitespace between nodes - XSLT</monty>
• Previous by thread: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by thread: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread