[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Problems with xs:redefine


RE:  Problems with xs:redefine
> Potential bug in Saxon 8.5.1: I noticed that it does not fire an
> UPA error for the above scenario; on the other hand it does fire the
> error if the @ref attributes are substituted for @name attributes.
> A "different/same element declaration" issue?

Yes, Saxon is testing only that the element declaration is unambiguously
identified; if two distinct particles refer to the same declaration, Saxon
doesn't report an error. It's a known and published limitation of Saxon that
it doesn't implement this bug in the spec ;-)

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.