[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Which license to choose
On Aug 10, 2005, at 22:26, Razvan MIHAIU wrote: > How about the GNU Free Documentation Licence ? The GFDL is designed for book-length works that may contain opinions. The license is inappropriate and an overkill for sample files. >> I have a question and I hope someone on this list can help me. If >> this is the wrong list to ask the question, please let me know. This does seem mostly off-topic except that XML samples may be interesting from the licensing point of view if they are used like utilities and not like literary works but still are not programs. >> Currently I am creating XML sample files that I can use when I build >> and test XML appilcations or when I just want to play with some new >> technology such as XQuery. I have just created a sourceforge project >> where I can put my files so other people can use them if they want. I >> googled and found some licenses such as the OPL (Open Content >> License) and the Creative Commons licenses. Note that the CC licenses and the GFDL (and, IIRC, the Open Content License) are considered non-free in the Debian sense. >> Has anyone experience with licenses that will grant others the right >> to use the sample files? As far as I'm concerned I do not wish to put >> any restrictions on the use of the sample files. Short of trying to waive copyright altogether (may not be simple in all jurisdictions), the "MIT"/"expat" license is about as non-restrictive as you can get. IANAL. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@i... http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|