[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Talking of HTML.... Anyone like lock-in?
Dave Pawson wrote: > http://copia.ogbuji.net/blog/2005/08/10#Today_s_XM > > I guess it is biassed. > I support that bias. It's not biased, the least offensive way I can think of putting it is that mandatory xsi:schemaLocation is just plain downright stupid, and that's not conveying the better part of my feeling on the subject, most of which involves a large variety of words shorter than five letters that are not acronyms. If that ever makes it through LC I'll give up on the Web and go work for a more sensical industry, say astrology, or perhaps breatharianism. Mandatory DTD can be up for discussion given how it's been used in the past for quirks mode detection and the such, but for sure if there's any way to do without it, I sure won't mind. > I'm with Uche on this one. As am I, except not entirely for the part where he talks about changing the namespace. Knowing when to change a namespace is a tough call and generally an unsolved problem, and calling it inconsistent is to overlook a few details. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|