[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Interesting pair of comments (was Re:
> Data binding tools use schemas for type information so you could say they > use them for PSVI [in a way] but not validation. Many of the interop > problems are of the form "my tool can bind to schemas with construct X > while my business partner's can't". A real world example of this is trying > to send nillable types back and forth between Java and .NET XML Web > Service toolkits. It is a funny question isn't it: can you have a PSVI when you have not validated? It's in the lax/strict ballpark I guess...you decide a priori that the document is valid. Is that the distinguishing feature that needs to be accommodated? No Schema Validation Infoset (NSVI)? Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|