[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Another XML parsing idea? Was: Re: XML Hangover)

• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, 'Pete Cordell' <petexmldev@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Another XML parsing idea? Was: Re: XML Hangover)
• From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@y...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=I08mX9bHuOf7r9rwaq2i3a+QF1ydFkT7hRMjQwhaTsQJcUvIkaLGQWDDX0BRO8jlQg1U7VrHv7XtcRZoR/JwBaTMxBGNnVbsbnW1XNiDmG7zvmm/Rg2bOBfUJ53MVIt+mxeq+ZX6QZX2az6rEsci71fY11J6Fr/509OvxaHJESg= ;

--- Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:

> A protocol implies sending and receiving messages
> typically across a process
> boundary or even a machine boundary. This would
> raise the cost of XML
> parsing by a couple of orders of magnitude.

I agree, that will be.. Thanks for your thoughts.

Regards,
Mukul

> Michael Kay
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mukul Gandhi [mailto:mukul_gandhi@y...]
> 
> > Sent: 13 July 2005 20:01
> > To: Michael Kay; 'Pete Cordell';
> xml-dev@l...
> > Subject:  Another XML parsing idea? Was:
> Re: 
> >  XML Hangover)
> > 
> > Today, we have a paradigm in XML parsing of using
> APIs
> > like SAX or DOM. I was thinking of another
> approach to
> > parse XML documents. 
> > 
> > Can we have a protocol (instead of API) that will
> talk
> > between a application and the XML parser? This
> shall
> > make using a XML parser interoperable to the
> calling
> > application.. We could achieve this "we could have
> a
> > Microsoft XML parser serving Java program's XML
> > parsing request.."
> >  
> > Just now we have APIs like SAX and DOM and
> proprietary
> > Microsoft APIs.. Had we had some protocol similar
> to
> > HTTP, that talked between a application and
> parser, it
> > may help interoperability..
> > 
> > Is this sensible thinking? Is this idea
> conceptually
> > similar to StAX or .NET XmlReader parsing
> approach?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Mukul


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

• Prev by Date: RE: Another XML parsing idea? Was: Re: XMLHangover)
• Next by Date: Re: css syntax - easy question
• Previous by thread: Re: Another XML parsing idea? Was: Re: XML Hangover)
• Next by thread: RE: Another XML parsing idea? Was: Re: XML Hangover)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread