[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Reject then reinvent..?

• To: Micah Dubinko <micah@d...>
• Subject: Re: Reject then reinvent..?
• From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>
• Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:18:08 +0300
• Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@g...>, "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <42BD8686.4060306@d...>
• References: <1f2ed5cd05062508106a9d1305@m...> <42BD8686.4060306@d...>

On Jun 25, 2005, at 19:29, Micah Dubinko wrote:

> Danny Ayers wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if there were any other cases around where a spec
>> avoided using something like RDF on religious grounds, then later
>> crept back in exactly that direction.
>>
> You mean like Web Forms 2.0? -m

The rationale for Web Forms 2.0 not being XForms is very pragmatic--not 
religious.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@i...
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

• References:
  • Reject then reinvent..?
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@g...>
  • Re: Reject then reinvent..?
    • From: Micah Dubinko <micah@d...>

• Prev by Date: Mailing list for RELAX NG users
• Next by Date: Re: Reject then reinvent..?
• Previous by thread: Re: Reject then reinvent..?
• Next by thread: Re: Reject then reinvent..?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread