[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why XML for Messaging?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
• Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:15:32 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200506021139.j52BdKA25840@r...>
• References: <200506021139.j52BdKA25840@r...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

Michael,

On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 7:39 am, Michael Kay wrote:
> > What I can tell you for sure is that customers patience in the
> > marketplace is rapidly slowing....
>
> If you expect anyone to believe such assertions, you need to back them up
> with facts and state your sources.

Are you saying that you want a survey? What percentage number would
you like to hear? know any good marketing firms?

Actually.. I withdraw the statement.. now that I think about it...

My mind was obviously wandering back to some other time in
the past. Maybe I was thinking of 2002/3...

The point is that now, a lot of smaller firms are getting in on the xml
action whereas in the past you had to be a bigger firm to be able to
access those structured messaging technologies.

Maybe it was a wording thing. Change the words "patience slowing" to
"anticipation growing". That is probably what I meant to say... 

As for proof of anything... it doesn't exist. Sorry.

Proof is a perfect example of a delusion.

Evidence, hear-say and beliefs are in all actuality, more trustworthy.

David


-- 
Computergrid : The ones with the most connections win.

• References:
  • RE: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by Date: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by thread: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread