[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: validating xml on the fly

• To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>, xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: validating xml on the fly
• From: Scott Paulding <pldng@y...>
• Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 15:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
• Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=A1qb4A8YFpgchoLwjoo3gi7JOf4I418hqoAe7C4Lf+U/Hiw2LXHcJ15I941xO7KdVVyi4NBwk3Q7c0uWLt5JjwUQi6qMv8rMfL8C/PzSqpi3benHj8W0OAqzPl4SYfb8XR6HfC1RRSWH0MaFnn5GWV8RMIxcMbZem33ZiDmveC4= ;
• In-reply-to: 6667

Ok...they are complete, well formed documents. Sorry for the
miscommunication.

-scott

--- Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...> wrote:
> Ah - by definition, an XML "fragment" is not well-formed and therefore
> will never validate (in the traditional use of the term "validate").
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Joseph Chiusano
> Booz Allen Hamilton
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Paulding [mailto:pldng@y...] 
> > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 6:17 PM
> > To: Chiusano Joseph; xml-dev
> > Subject: RE:  validating xml on the fly
> > 
> > Sorry, no. The the chunking process creates xml fragments. 
> > 
> > -scott
> > 
> > --- Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...> wrote:
> > > Did you perhaps mean for your subject to be "validating sgml on the 
> > > fly"?
> > > 
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Joseph Chiusano
> > > Booz Allen Hamilton
> > > Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> > >  
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Scott Paulding [mailto:pldng@y...]
> > > > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 5:57 PM
> > > > To: xml-dev
> > > > Subject:  validating xml on the fly
> > > > 
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > We are currently taking large SGM manuals (50 MB +, per each) and 
> > > > chunking them down into smaller fragments. I was wondering how to 
> > > > validate these chunks against our schema as they are created?
> > > > 
> > > > Please help!
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > -scott
> > > > 
> > > > "If only we'd stop trying to be happy we could have a pretty good 
> > > > time."
> > > >         - Edith Wharton
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 		
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!? 
> > > > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site 
> > > > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
> > > > 
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an 
> > > > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> > > > 
> > > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> > > > 
> > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> > > > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > "If only we'd stop trying to be happy we could have a pretty 
> > good time." 
> >         - Edith Wharton
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection 
> > around http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > 
> 

"If only we'd stop trying to be happy we could have a pretty good time." 
        - Edith Wharton

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: validating xml on the fly
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: validating xml on the fly
• Next by Date: RE: validating xml on the fly
• Previous by thread: RE: validating xml on the fly
• Next by thread: RE: validating xml on the fly
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread