[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Tamino status

• To: <frank.jung@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Tamino status
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:31:09 -0000
• Cc: <elharo@m...>
• In-reply-to: <76EEB38C72AE1D4EA2FE2753766EB5145CE10D@D...>
• Thread-index: AcUg1KxcGTB7DTWhSw+Kh6n0+rCgEQAHIdNAAAXuT1A=

> A good sign for this 
> "maturity" is probably the fact that more and more customers 
> are using Tamino in mission-critical scenarios. 

Nice to hear from you Frank.

I'm working with one Tamino user who's using the product in fairly complex
but not really mission-critical HR applications. I think we'd like to hear
more detail about successful applications of XML databases (not just Tamino
of course) and the tasks they are being applied to in practice - and about
plans for more complete XQuery support. Sometimes, when the deal has been
done and the sales people move on, users can start to feel lonely. This
isn't necessarily the right forum of course - but Elliotte did ask!

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Tamino status
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Tamino status
    • From: <frank.jung@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Schema, BNF and parsing
• Next by Date: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT ismissing from the UCS ?
• Previous by thread: RE: Tamino status
• Next by thread: Re: Tamino status
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread