[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?

• To: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:50:58 -0700
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=gGciuAQE6BfTCgXWSH9rA/WFBbJBP22dcPkeQ50TYXD1Rhos/Brkz9h+hfYQe4fzu/NUzpNQbvN3MNj6lFP7uEKRb3k7B98NPZwvCgZLs7T83z2yj2Jxd50+7BGHsUMcuvppC1A49ZrrubjIvYWie74Z07opzpt6fuTm6pYRVD4=
• In-reply-to: <20050329114216.GB8064@b...>
• References: <E1DFcEL-0004ZP-00@d...> <db1e5a999923502eaceb50b06518b247@b...> <f8da4eba0503280115101d1d20@m...> <ee12f91a24d850d90d080dc79ee1fdd2@b...> <f8da4eba05032806516da7bacf@m...> <9a6a8e5453b3ef9bd0667a481623550d@b...> <f8da4eba050328114615097366@m...> <20050329091254.GB17619@b...> <f8da4eba05032901342a0ef6d5@m...> <20050329114216.GB8064@b...>
• Reply-to: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>

Hey, thanks for all this Chris!  I appreciate the time you spent to
help me/anyone else paying attention understand this better...

Cheers :)

<M:D/>


On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:42:16 +0100, Chris Burdess <dog@b...> wrote:
> M. David Peterson wrote:
> > Oh, I dont... sorry, didnt mean to lead you into the belief that this
> > is what I was suggesting.  Your earlier numbers were significant and
> > while obviously the difference comes 100% from the transformation
> > engine at the time of the comment I simply wondered if you had found
> > ways to gain greater performance, possibly by illiminating, or better
> > said, integrating the libxmlj code more directly into the JAXP cose
> > base itself...  e.g.  Instead of simply providing a Factory instance
> > for JAXP to pass the proper information to binding the libxmlj library
> > directly into the JAXP code base, and fif so possibly adding a bit of
> > a performance enhancment.
> 
> The figures given were for the 100% Java transformer, not the libxmlj
> one. The libxmlj transformer is considerably faster as long as it's
> working with libxmlj sources.
> 
> The performance difference is down to the transformer rather than its
> integration into the JAXP framework. The same SAX parser and DOM
> implementation were used in both instances (GNU JAXP and Xalan).
> 
> Both the 100% Java and the libxmlj implementations are integrated into
> the JAXP framework in a standard way and can be used with Sun's JAXP
> framework.
> --
> Chris Burdess
> 


-- 
<M:D/>

:: M. David Peterson ::
XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist

• References:
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Next by Date: Re: XML friendly runtime templating languages
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread