[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come f

• To: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
• From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek@l...>
• Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:43:53 -0800
• Cc: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>, "'Ronald Bourret'" <rpbourret@r...>
• In-reply-to: <420A6947.6020706@o...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206BD6@h...> <420A6947.6020706@o...>

On Feb 9, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Bob Foster wrote:

> Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>> Hmm.  Format camps.  Now there's a thought.
>
> Please Daddy don't send me to format camp! It's no fun there. They 
> just argue all the time and nobody plays together.

Yep, no fun there. And most of the argueing either way is more 
handwaving FUD than arguments backed up by facts.

I'd be glad if one could articulate what's conceptually wrong about the 
intended usage and performance numbers of a practical binary xml 
example, say, the bnux binary xml codec 
(http://dsd.lbl.gov/nux/api/nux/xom/binary/BinaryXMLCodec.html).

Wolfgang.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• References:
  • RE: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from?
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread