[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

• To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• Subject: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 16:02:51 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20050204172344.2e2a9887.amyzing@t...>
• References: <6.0.0.22.0.20050204222038.02251d70@p...> <20050204204803.GA31024@t...> <4203E19D.2030607@j...> <20050204214937.GA31170@t...> <4203F15A.2070109@k...> <20050204172344.2e2a9887.amyzing@t...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:04:10 -0800
> Robert Koberg <rob@k...> wrote:
> 
>>Do you think the future of /XML/ editing is going to be done in text 
>>editors?
> 
> 
> I can't see any reason to change.  Part of the point of XML was that it
> was a text-based format, easy to edit.  My experience with XML editors
> that try to hide things from me is [censored].

yea, well, I wonder how much knowledge/experience you have with all the 
different things that do xml.

> 
> Amy!
> (that's just the way I sign my name ... try to cope)

FWIW, I thought it is cool that you sign your name that way. Plus I 
think amyzing is cool too. I wasn't trying to be an ass(on that point, 
at least).

• References:
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@p...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: IT Manager Survey Finds 59% Of UK Businesses Are NowUsing XML
• Next by Date: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Previous by thread: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Next by thread: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread