[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on

• To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek@l...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:14:29 -0800
• Cc: kjouk@y..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <421CF035.6070008@m...>
• References: <E1D2Si4-0001QA-00@u...> <200502211623.51418.kjones@s...> <421A0ECF.3090802@m...> <200502220742.53890.kjouk@y...> <421B03D2.6020803@m...> <e3e82eebdc6fa9346729066b1497431b@l...> <421C8024.9010505@m...> <d091208de21a45d5dc1d820d8806e122@l...> <421CE54B.2060507@m...> <3696bc75e6a4da46d91f61d03bba0b16@l...> <421CF035.6070008@m...>

> I've also found the queries, but they're quite a few there, some of 
> which are quite simple. Is there one of them in particular you think 
> is slow that I should start testing with?

Just run them all. The results should be self explanatory.

Then use a tool such as generateTestData() to generate test data of 
size 10 MB, 100 MB, or similar, and rerun.

>
> Running your command wouldn't tell me much since that uses NUX and 
> Saxon and I'm interesting in seeing what XOM and Jaxen do.

To test XOM's Jaxen based CVS XPath, use the "xom" command line 
argument as given in the command previously mentioned.

Wolfgang.

• References:
  • RE: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Kevin Jones <kjones@s...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek@l...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek@l...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek@l...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Next by Date: Re: schema keyref to other schema.
• Previous by thread: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Next by thread: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread