[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XPath and XPattern (was Re: More on tamingSAX)
> Then people could read up on it, rather than post messages like "I > heard through the grapevine that predicates generally don't work with > streaming". Then again, I suppose, it's fun to do analysis from > scratch. Ah well, whatever it is, it'll be good to see streaming > processors! I said what I said after reading the latest STX spec and only in the context of this discussion (which is "taming SAX"). I have to agree with Uche in saying that STXPath is very nice-- but may not be exactly what we are shooting for. Surely predicates are viable in many cases in partial scans such as: <foo> <bar> <baz/> </bar> <bar test="foo"> <baz/> </bar> </foo> /foo/bar[@test="foo"]/baz But when considering /foo/bar[baz3="test"]/baz1 <foo> <bar> <baz1/> <baz2/> <baz3>test</baz3> </bar> </foo> This predicate's value cannot be ascertained at the point of the baz1 startElement event in a single event look ahead model. At least that is what I heard through the grapevine. Jeff Rafter
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|