[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:36:15 +0400 (AMT)
• In-reply-to: <200411281827.iASIRZvU032508@a...>

David Tolpin:
> John Cowan:
> > > Moreover, RelaxNG is tied to XML Schema in the same way XQuery is,
> > > it (Relax NG) relies on W3C XML Schema datatypes.
> > 
> > It doesn't *rely* on them.  They are optionally provided by particular
> > RELAX NG validators.
> 
> 1. Any real-word RelaxNG grammar that does not use XSD?
> 2. Which of usable RelaxNG validators is 'unparticular' in this respect?
> 
> The only datatype library in 'production' use for RelaxNG is XSD.

Moreover, the RELAX NG compact syntax specification explicitly
mentions XML Schema Datatypes as the predefined binding for
xsd: prefix. And it is the only datatype prefix defined for RelaxNG.

I too think that grass could be greener, but the reality is that
RelaxNG relies on W3C XML Schema part 2, practicaly in the same
way as XQuery does.

David Tolpin
http://davidashen.net/

• References:
  • Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Next by Date: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Previous by thread: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Next by thread: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread