[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++

• To: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>
• Subject: Re: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++?
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:00:51 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20041105184903.11228.qmail@w...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1027670DD@R...> <20041105184903.11228.qmail@w...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 01:49:03PM -0500, Gerald Bauer wrote:
[...]
>    Finally, allow me to highlight some descriptions
> that show that XAML is clearly targeted as an HTML
> alternative:
> 
>   * Paragraph -	Implements a block-level element used
> to render text in a paragraph. Rendering behavior is
> analagous to that of the paragraph element in HTML.
> 
>   * Note - Implements a Note element, which is
> analagous to the BLOCKQUOTE Element in HTML.
> 

I'm not sure how a note is similar to quoted text from an
identified source.  Are you suggesting that the way that
information is presented is the only significant meaing?

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++?
    • From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>

• References:
  • RE: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • RE: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++?
    • From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# orXML++?
• Next by Date: RE: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++?
• Previous by thread: RE: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# orXML++?
• Next by thread: Re: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread