[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable


RE:  [OT]  Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable
Title: Message
I think that these definitions work well in terms of an interface.  However, if one looks at an implementation X of an interface B, the implementation might be said to 'evolve' if it changes without any change to the interface B.  Such 'evolution' might be to improve performance in some respect, with better algorithms surviving and poorer algorithms being killed off.
 
Chris Angus
-----Original Message-----
From: Alessandro Triglia [mailto:sandro@m...]
Sent: 02 June 2004 15:45
To: 'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'; 'Roger L. Costello'; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?

 
In my opinion, if we refer to interfaces (or languages/syntaxes) rather than, generically, to "information systems", the distinction between evolution and extension becomes clearer and more useful.
 
My concept of "extensible" interface is that the interface supports certain rigorously-defined extensions to it with the following property:
 
------------------
Given:
 
- an implementation that exposes the base (non-extended) interface B;
- an implementation that exposes an extended interface E1;
- an implementation that exposes another extended interface E2,
 
a program written to use interface B is guaranteed to work (as expected) when using any of these three implementations, "thinking" that it is using an implementation of interface B.
------------------
 
The same concept of extensibility would also apply to languages/syntaxes.
 
On the other hand, if an interface or a language "evolves", one cannot expect that the condition above is satisfied (although it could be).
 
In other words, while I expect to be able to use an extended interface as if it were the corresponding base interface, I don't expect to be able to use an evolved interface as if it were the corresponding unevolved interface.  Same thing for a language/syntax.
 
I think "evolvability" in this context means simply that an interface or a language can be modified easily, inexpensively, and nicely, in order to meet new requirements - without implying that a user can ignore that there has been a modification.
 
If we refer to a system, I would say that it is possible for a system to *evolve* while some of its interfaces are simply *extended* (while others evolve).
 
Alessandro Triglia
 

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.