[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ANN: Typekit Framework
Eric van der Vlist (vdv@d...) wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 14:31, Eric Hanson wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > I'm happy to announce the Typekit Framwork: > > > > http://typekit.org/ > > On the bright side, I like the way you've described how "Typekit > servers" give access the descriptions and resources. > > The main question I have is the motivation for not using RDDL in Typekit > (at first glance, I have a feeling that Typekit could be a complement to > RDDL instead of a competitor)! I agree! There are three main reasons: 1. RDDL is an extension of XHTML which IMHO would be better accomplished by keeping data and presentation seperate. If humans want to view at this data, transform it to XHTML. 2. XLink? Adds complexity and obscurity to the document. Adds value? Other things as well I think convolude RDDL without adding much value. Keeping things simple and pretty is a high priority. 3. The main goal of typekit is to make it possible to plug resources into applications in a machine-capable fashion. For that to be realized, resource descriptions need more than nature and purpose. I know RDDL 2.0 has been talked about, and I'd be happy to contribute whatever I can to that effort. Eric
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|