[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML-appropriate editing data structures
> Give me a key to tap on if I need help. *However*, several of my > colleagues absolutely cannot comprehend this attitude, and profess > themselves unable to survive without automatic code-completion sorts of > facilities (most of them type slow, too, she sneered). If they can be turned off you are satisfied? For users that use them they are imperative. They are clearly not harmful for those users-- how can it be considered harmful by nature? While I am happy to concede the point that there are many states of document editing, many of which include invalidity or non-wellformedness, requiring that editors only exist in this mode seems extreme. I am also willing to concede the point that, in the event of poorly designed configurations, certain options can be harmful-- like a poorly designed autocomplete algorithm. But I don't understand how, if the user invokes the dialog with some sort of key sequence, offering a list of elements that are valid at a given point can be considered a bad thing. It is entirely optional, and when needed, exceedingly helpful. All the best, Jeff Rafter
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|