[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: What's wrong with a XBL, SVG-RCC, XForms combo?
> PS: XBL stands for XML Binding Language and is > bascially nothing more than a CORBA-like IDL > (Interface Definition Language) that lets you "plugin" > your own XUL tags written in C/C++, for example. If > you use C#, Java, Python or any other modern language > that supports reflection (that is, built-in runtime > type information) you don't need the useless XBL > bloat. > This is wrong (except on what xbl stands for). XBL is more like dhtml behavior in ie or rcc in svg. It essentially allows you to define your own xul tags and attach behaviors to them (constructors, methods, properties, event handler, etc.). You can use javascript to implement your xbl bindings. This even works in remote xul (i.e. your xbl extensions gets downloaded with your main xul document from a web server). Unpack your toolkit.jar in your mozilla distribution, you can see tons of examples of this. The "corba-like IDL" thingy mentioned is used in xpcom, which you can use in your xbl bindings or NOT. I totally second the comments that we don't need any more specs. We have enough spec to do rich internet applications (xul+xbl+svg+rcc). We only need more and solid implementations of the specs.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|